Men tend to possess a bad understanding of prostate cancer, their own risk for the cancer, and the methods available for detecting if they have prostate cancer. Many men have minimal, if any, knowledge of the merit of screening for prostate cancer or of the guidelines for when they should commence testing, how frequently to screen, and the meaning of screening test results. They believe that their physician will do whatever is appropriate to find any cancer early and cure them.
Delayed diagnosis of prostate cancer examples are all too common. One common type of medical mistake that forms the basis for these cases comes about when a man's primary care physician (1) actually screens the individual for prostate cancer by checking the amount of PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) in his bloodstream, (2) records abnormally elevated levels of PSA and yet (3) neither tells the patient of abnormal results (and what they signify) nor orders diagnostic tests, such as a biopsy, to eliminate prostate cancer. Examine the following lawsuit, for example:
A physician, an internist, found that his male patient had a PSA of 8. (anything above a 4.0 is ordinarily considered high). The physician did not tell the patient. The physician failed to refer the patient to a urologist. The doctor did not order a biopsy. Two years later the physician repeated the PSA test. This time the PSA level had risen to 13.6. Once again, the physician said nothing to the patient. Again, the physician did not refer the patient to a urologist. And again, the doctor did not order a biopsy. Two years later the physician repeated the PSA test. It was not until three years after first learning of the patient's raised PSA level that the doctor finally advised him that he probably had cancer. By the time he was diagnosed he had advanced prostate cancer and surgery was not among the treatment alternatives. Treating doctors alternatively advised radiation therapy and hormone therapy. Neither of these would eliminate the cancer but they might decrease the cancer's advancement and further spread. The law firm that handled this matter reported that they took the claim to mediation where they were able to obtain a settlement of $600,000.
If they do not do anything when the tests indicate the possiblity of cancer and the patient later learns that he had prostate cancer and that the delay lead to it spreading outside the prostate gland therefore limiting treatment alternatives and lowering his possibility of surviving the cancer, the person might be able to successfully pursue a claim against the doctor.
At a minimum a physician who notes abnormal prostate cancer screening results ought to tell the patient of the chance that he may have prostate cancer and refer the patient to a urologist. The physician can likewise suggest diagnostic testing, like a biopsy in order to find out whether the abnormal screening test results come from prostate cancer.
As the above case demonstrates physicians sometimes follow the guidelines in performing screening for prostate cancer but when the test results are abnormal they do not follow through.
Artice Source: http://www.articlesphere.com
Related Articles in Malpractice
People interested in the above article are also interested in the related articles listed below:
The Supreme Court of India has vide above judgment (M/s Cochin Shipyard Ltd. v. Apeejay Shipping Ltd. (2015) 43 SCD 113) answered the above question ‘No’ and clearly held that any misconduct by the Arbitrator should be manifestly discernible from record.
Quickly report the particular situations for the law enforcement. Firmly insist an investigator been trained in erotic attack situations become allotted to look into. Several law enforcement officials' organizations have particularly qualified sexual assault detectives who're educated to get data a uniformed police officer simply is not necessarily ready for.
Personal injury case is not possible if you do not have lawyers to handle your claim. It is important to have one because lawyers knows how to process this legal matter. Being injured in n accident needs an attention not only for medication but also exercising your rights by having the full compensation from the person who caused that injury. The culprit has the liability to pay all your medical bills and other damages. This is the purpose of the personal injury case in which it is being filed to the higher courts.