Banks Squat On The Economy, Foreclosure Victims In Homes

A growing trend during the current depression is squatters moving into bank-owned homes and living in them rent and mortgage free. Although this seems astounding, with the inflated real estate bubble not yet completely burst, banks reluctant to recognize losses on such properties, and so many empty homes available, it was a likely result of the collapse.

With real estate developers having constructed far more houses than could ever have been sold, real homelessness does not have to be an option for foreclosed homeowners or the unemployed. Instead, they can often just move into an empty property and take further advantage of the bubble in real estate construction.

Rents and selling prices in many local markets of the nation will still need to come down to reflect a return to more reasonable real estate values. But banks, which were too willing to lend 100% of the value of an inflated property, are now unwilling to acknowledge their mistakes and allow homeowners to sell for less than the total amount owed on the mortgage.

Banks' unwillingness to allow short sales is forcing selling prices higher than the market value of properties, especially properties in distress. In some areas of the country, a large number of homes are selling for $300,000 to $1 million, but rentals are available for $600 to $1,200. Landlords must be losing significant amounts of money every month.

Lenders are also reluctant to help homeowners stay in their houses by modifying loans or offering other realistic solutions to help prevent foreclosure. This makes it almost inevitable that borrowers will have to sell, but then they face the issue of getting a short sale approved by their mortgage company.

So real estate prices are still too high compared to the rents that properties are generating, and foreclosure rates are higher than they would otherwise be if banks voluntarily negotiated with homeowners. In a freer market than we have now, banks would have an incentive to work with homeowners to stop foreclosure if there was a realistic expectation of having the loan paid back in time.

For example, banks charging 6% interest on a mortgage may lower the rate temporarily to 4% or less to assist homeowners who demonstrate a long-term ability to keep their loan current. While this may be a temporary loss to the lender, it will not be a total loss, as is the case with many foreclosures. And this agreement could be worked out between the owners and bank voluntarily, with foreclosure as the last resort.

But right now, banks have every incentive not to allocate extra resources to helping borrowers. Instead, they can let homes go into foreclosure and try to keep real estate prices artificially high. When this plan fails and they are forced to recognize total losses on loans, they simply blackmail or threaten legislators into handing over billions of dollars to paper over losses.

This keeps foreclosure rates high and pushes homeowners out of properties, all the while forcing them to contribute to the bailing out of the mortgage lenders. Obviously, the banks feel entitled to looting taxpayers for trillions of dollars and Congress and the Federal Reserve acquiesce to such demands time and time again.

Therefore, who can blame foreclosure victims or the unemployed for feeling as if they are entitled to share in the bank's wealth (i.e., the taxpayers' wealth) and take over bank-owned foreclosed properties? People are being forced to bail out financial institutions, so they force their own way into a piece of the bailouts by squatting and living rent free.

Either the bailouts need to stop for everyone, or everyone should get a free home. Over $10 trillion has been appropriated by Congress and the Fed for solving the financial crisis so far, which amounts to over $33,000 for every person in America. That could be enough to allow people to live mortgage and conscience free inside an empty house for a long time.

Squatting in an abandoned or foreclosed home is clearly wrong (at least morally, since legal determinations mean nothing these days), and not an activity anyone should engage in. But banks squatting in the American economy, threatening destruction of the entire financial system, and living parasitically off of the productive is wrong on an even bigger scale. Putting an end to the latter may put an end to the former.

Rate Article

Related Videos
Play Video How to Update Your Home on a Budget	Play Video Monitoring Money in and out on the Quicken Online Home Tab	Play Video Moving to Canada: financial advice	Play Video RECESSION PROOF YOUR HOLIDAY SHOPPING	Play Video Space Lift: Get Rich Quick

Listed below are more articles related to the above article from the "Finance" article category.

People interested in the above article "Banks Squat On The Economy, Foreclosure Victims In Homes" are also interested in the related articles listed below:

 

Finding A Solution To Commercial Disputes

In the world of commerce and industry there are always conflicts stemming from all sorts of sources. Sometimes commercial disputes are a result of debts that remain paid; faulty products that were bought or even the rare scenario of a person not performing his part of a binding contract. Whatever the case may be commercial disputes involve money and that's all that counts.

Are You Involved In Commercial Disputes

There are many different types of commercial disputes that may require hiring an attorney who specializes in the field. Every single day business owners find themselves in situations like these. The following paragraphs will briefly discuss some of the different types of commercial disputes, as well as how to locate a good lawyer.

How to Reduce Credit Card Debt

Getting into debt is easy but getting out of it really a difficult task. This holds good for any kind of debt and includes credit card debt too. Credit card debt reduction needs planning and discipline in the way you spend money.

Seven Types of Loss Mitigation During Foreclosure

Homeowners dealing with the threat of foreclosure should know about as many options as possible, if they are attempting to save their homes before time runs out. Some of these options fall under the category of "loss mitigation."

More Examples of Predatory Actions by Collection Agencies

The number of potential violations of law, court procedures, and common human decency that the owners, managers, and employees of collection agencies have been caught engaging in is almost endless. Homeowners facing foreclosure, consumers considering bankruptcy, and even families attempting to pay back loans but who have fallen on hard times should be aware of these tactics in order to recognize them as the violations they are.

How Collection Agencies Prey on Borrowers

It should come as no surprise that the vast majority of people who fall behind on debt payments do so for financial hardship reasons -- not because they are simply deadbeats. Despite, this, however debt collection agencies often take steps to inflict the maximum amount of anxiety, fear, and embarrassment on borrowers who fall behind on loans, going so far as harassment and engaging in other illegal acts.

Lawyers Lie to Judges About Foreclosure Cases

Seventy-five percent of foreclosure lawsuits that banks initiate are based on wrong documentation. But too few homeowners even appear in court to defend their homes, and the ones do show up to a foreclosure hearing do not know enough about the law and their rights.