Crosswalks are meant to offer a safe area for pedestrians. They are supposed to give pedestrians a clear right of way. They are supposed to signal to drivers an area of the road where they have to use caution. They are usually clearly marked. They are often controlled by traffic signs or light signals. Nevertheless they do not guarantee pedestrians a safe location to cross a street. It is not uncommon for lawyers handling claims regarding motor vehicle accidents to be approached by pedestrians who were hit by an automobile as they were crossing the street in a marked crosswalk. When a vehicular accident involves a pedestrian the injuries are regularly severe and have extreme long-term consequences. Think about the next cases.
Case 1: This published lawsuit involved the driver of a bus which hit a pedestrian. When the accident took place the victim was in a marked crosswalk. The driver failed to stop subsequent to striking the victim. As the bus kept going it ran over the pedestrian. The pedestrian was a female, 50 years of age, a grandmother, who was on her way to buy presents for her grandchildren from a local store. The woman sustained several fractures. She had rib fractures. She had pelvic fractures. She had a spinal fracture. The pedestrian will require hip replacement surgery for her hip fracture injury. The law firm that helped the pedestrian was able to report achieving a $1.25 million settlement for her.
Case 2: A driver was speeding in a heavily trafficked region of a large metropolitan city. There were a large number of pedestrians in the vicinity. The car involved was a rental car. He ran a red light and slammed into a van. The force of the impact forced the van onto the crosswalk just as a twenty five year old man was crossing the street at the crosswalk. The accident left the pedestrian with a thoracic level spinal cord dislocation resulting in total paralyzes from the chest down.. The law firm that handled this case filed a claim for the pedestrian victim against the driver and the car rental company. Unable to reach a settlement, the law firm took the case to trial. The jury verdict was partially upheld to the sum of $20,300,000 by the trial judge. This included $10 million for future pain and suffering. The remainder covered the cost of medical care, past and future loss of earning capacity, and pain and suffering.
Case 3: This claim report involved the driver of a school bus making a left hand turn at an intersection. While making the turn the bus ran over a pedestrian's foot. The pedestrian was a 54 year old female who was walking across an intersection in a designated crosswalk. The driver of the bus was oblivious to what had transpired. It took the efforts of witnesses getting the driver's attention and getting the driver to go into reverse so that the wheel of the bus would release the pedestrian's foot. The pedestrian sustained several severe injuries to her foot and leg. The woman had to have multiple surgeries in an attempt to save her leg. Ultimately, though, she lost her leg as she required a below the knee amputation. Following the amputation she suffered from constant phantom pain. The law firm that handled the personal injury claim reported that the case went to trial and the jury awarded the victim $5,900,000.
By comparing and contrasting these case we discover first that each case is unique. Extrapolating from the lawsuit it is clear that a case can involve a car, a bus, a truck, or even a motorcycle. The plaintiffs, even when we consider incidents involving only pedestrians, can be male or female and can be any age.
The cases, however, do tend to share a number of things in common. First, crosswalks are no guarantee of safety. Drivers are easily distracted. In the first claim above the driver failed to even realize she had caused an accident and had run over a person. In the second lawsuit the driver was speeding and did not stop for a red light. In the third lawsuit bystanders had to get the driver to back up in order to release the pedestrian's foot pinned under the vehicle. Victims of pedestrian injuries of the type highlighted in these claims should consult a highly skilled and experienced pedestrian accident lawyer.
Artice Source: http://www.articlesphere.com
Related Articles in Legal
People interested in the above article are also interested in the related articles listed below:
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) lost two arbitration proceedings filed by M/S Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) and Kochi Cricket Pvt. Ltd (KCPL) and awards dated 22.06.2015 were pronounced. On 16th September 2015, BCCI challenged both the above said arbitration awards by filing applications under Section 34 of the act.
All sort of business will necessitate a business law advice at one end or other. From the merchant relationships in order to authoritarian compliances, tax & payroll problem, employment matters, a day to day function of your business provides a myriad of challenges.
If you believe you have a case for Wrongful Owner Move In Eviction, what can you do? An introduction to a lawsuit for wrongful or fraudulent owner move in (OMI) eviction in San Francisco under San Francisco Rent Ordinance sec. 37.9(a)(8).