Article Sphere Logo

Is Procreation Inherently Immoral?

By Expert Author: Philip Yaffe Platinum Expert Author | Article Abstract
Word Count: 944 words | Views: 99 view(s)
I have never had children. I have raised a child, a boy from my wife's first marriage; however, I have never created one of my own. It's not that I don't like children. It's just that I have never felt the need to project my genes down the corridors of time.

People sometimes ask me if I regret never having had any children of my own, and the answer is still "no". However, a related question has been niggling at me for some time: Is there any moral justification for having children in the first place? In other words, is procreation inherently immoral?

I haven't dared ask this of any of my friends and acquaintances for fear of their (probably intemperate) reaction. So to research the question myself, I entered "morality of having children" into an Internet search engine. I was disappointed by the results. Virtually all of answers added an extension to the question, e.g. "morality of having children if you are too poor to properly care for them", "the morality of having children if your country is over-populated", the "morality of having children if so doing would risk the life of the mother", and so on.

But no one seemed prepared to grapple with the fundamental question itself. Is there any moral justification for having children, whatever the circumstances?

I am certain that other people must have thought about this; however, they seem to be keeping their opinions to themselves. Or perhaps I am wrong. Perhaps the presumption of having children is so ingrained in the human psyche that asking such a question really hasn't occurred to anyone else. If this is the case, stand by to make history because here come my thoughts on the matter.

There are two fundamental ways of approaching the question, from the religious point of view of religion and the non-religious point of view.

Religious Aspects of Procreation

Not being a religious scholar, I am going to limit this part of the discussion mainly to the Judeo-Christian concepts of religion.

People brought up in the Judeo-Christian traditional all know about God's biblical injunction to "be fruitful and multiply". And we certainly have been doing so.

Human population growth over the past hundred years has been truly phenomenal. The world's population, which stood at only 2.5 billion in 1950, had doubled to 5 billion by 1990, and passed 6 billion just before the end of the century. As of March 2009, the estimated world population had already reached 6.8 billion. In other words, we have already added another 800 million souls in less than ten years.

People raised in the Judeo-Christian tradition are also aware of the biblical assertion that we are all born into sin and that this sin must be expiated. If we are successful in doing so, we ascend to eternal bliss in heaven. If not, we descend to eternal torment in hell.

Most Christians are convinced that their children will of course ascend to heaven. However, this is by no means certain; every soul that comes into the world must inexorably face the prospect of cast down into hell.

I know that Jesus is supposed to have died for our sins. I also know that unless we believe this and accept Him as our personal savior, we cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. Clearly, not everyone believes this, which means that each day thousands of babies come into the world for whom heaven will be eternally barred and hell will be eternally open.

While most loving parents shudder at the thought of exposing their children any kind of physical danger, they seem perfectly willing to expose them to the greatest danger imaginable, eternal damnation.

Can this possibly be moral?

Non-religious Aspects of Procreation

Suppose you don't believe the stories of heaven and hell. What then? Even if you don't take responsibility for a child's eternal well-being, you must still take responsibility for his temporal well-being. Once again, the prospects are disconcerting.

Even before he is born, a child faces the possibility of physical malformation, mental retardation, or congenital disease. In some parts of the world, the risk is very low; however, there is always a risk. Any loving parent would surely prevent a child from eating a piece of candy picked up off the ground for fear that it might make him ill. Yet the self-same loving parent perfectly willing to risk a lifetime of illness for the child by virtue of forcing him to be born.

As the child grows, he must constantly face the prospect of violence, war, poverty, oppression, drought, famine, pestilence, and the hundreds of other ills man is heir to. Even if he is lucky enough to escape all of these, he still must confront the aches, pains, feebleness of mind and body, and other distasteful attributes of old age, unless of course he is fortunate enough to die young.

In short, whether you are religious or not, the decision to procreate would seem to be an act of high insensitivity, if not actually immorality.

To repeat, I have never created a child of my own. Given the foregoing considerations, I am not fully certain of what I feel about people who have created a child or children of their own; however, I am strongly leaning towards disapproval.

Because I am now in my seventh decade, the thought of procreating, while still technically feasible, would seem highly unadvisable. Instead, I am ineluctably thinking more and more about what I might wish to have inscribed on my tombstone. I haven't yet made up my mind, but I am leaning towards the following:

Dear God, if God there be,
Know this to be my legacy,
My sins were many,
Yet blame I shun,
For I have never inflicted life on anyone.
Philip Yaffe

About the Author/Author Bio

Philip Yaffe is a former writer with The Wall Street Journal and international marketing communication consultant. He now teaches courses in persuasive communication in Brussels, Belgium. Because his clients use English as a second or third language, his approach to writing and public speaking is somewhat different from other communication coaches. He is the author of In the “I” of the Storm: the Simple Secrets of Writing and Speaking (Almost) like a Professional. Contact: phil.yaffe@yahoo.com

Article Source: http://www.articlesphere.com/Article/Is-Procreation-Inherently-Immoral-/183013

Article Submitted: 2009-03-24 | This Article has been viewed 99 times.

Rate Article

Related Videos

What is Children's Art Day
How to Find a Publisher for Children's Books
How to Write a Book for Children: Do I Need an Illustrator?
Can You Make It As a Children's Book Writer?
Should Children Go to Neighbors Home
 

More "Parenting" Related Articles

 
 

Listed below are more articles related to the above article from the "Parenting" article category.

People interested in the above article "Is Procreation Inherently Immoral?" are also interested in the related articles listed below:

 
The Chinese baby calendar was developed some 700 years ago by Chinese Scientists. This Chinese baby gender predictor is thought by many in the far east to be very accurate, as much as 99 per cent! Regardless whether you are a believer or not, the Chinese gender prediction chart can be a lot of fun to experiment with.
An Au Pair is typically a young woman between the late teens to mid-thirties whom is in the occupation of child care. They trade room and board abroad for their services in child care. An Au Pair will get into the business with the hopes of furthering their education outside of their country of origin, or having the luxury of traveling where they may not typically have been able to afford to do so, giving them the experience of being with a host family in a foreign country.
The Chinese Lunar Calendar for baby gender prediction is beleived to be 99 per cent accurate in determining gender, but that is only if you learn how to use it properly. Join me as we take a look at how to find the proper dates to help assure an accurate result.
The Consumer Products Safety Commission reports there were an average of 162,500 toy-related injuries among children under age 15 during the three year period from 2005 to 2007. During this same three year period, 71 children under age 15 died as a result of their injuries. These figures include 26 kids in 2005, 27 kids in 2006 and another 18 in 2007.
The U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission reports there were a whopping 232,900 toy-related injuries resulting in emergency room treatments in 2007. There were also 18 toy-related deaths among children under age 15. To help prevent these hazards, the CPSC has developed mandatory safety standards for manufacturers in the $30 billion play toys industry. The manufactures have added to these standards with their own voluntary standards. Together these standards have greatly reduced risks of choking, lead poisoning and other potential hazards.
Many children spend hours playing with dollhouse toys, carefully arranging and dramatizing scenarios. Not only are kids enthusiastic about it, but there are numerous educational benefits to playing with a miniature dollhouse.
A few simple Top Tips will keep baby safe and provide confidence to Mum and Dad that baby's toys are safe. These days' manufacturers must work to very rigorous requirements and regulations to ensure that child's toys are safe. Gone are the days of toxic paint and other materials which can cause harm.
Toys are also graded by age with small parts being excluded from baby products.
 
Article Directory Home All Categories Home And Family Parenting
 

Can't find what you're looking for? Try Google Search!
 
Copyright © 2005 - by Larry Lim, Singapore - Article Search Engine Directory at ArticleSphere.com™
All Rights Reserved Worldwide. All Trademarks and Servicemarks are the property of the respective owners.

Afrikaans Albanian Arabic Belarusian Bulgarian Catalan Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Croatian Czech Danish German English Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Irish Italiano Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Malay Maltese Dutch Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swahili Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese Welsh Yiddish